WebWillis Music Co. advertised a television set at $22.50 in the Sunday newspaper. Ehrlich ordered a set, but the company refused to deliver it on the grounds that the price in the newspaper ad was a mistake. Ehrlich sued the company.Was it liable? Why or why not? [ Ehrlich v. Willis Music Co ., 113 N.E.2d 252 (Ohio App.)] Step-by-step solution WebAnswer of Willis Music Co. advertised a television set at $22.50 in the Sunday newspaper. Ehrlich ordered a set, but the company refused to deliver it on the...
Willis Music Co. advertised a television set at $22.50 in ... - Chegg
WebMar 9, 2024 · Willis Music Co. advertised a television set at $22.50 in the Sunday newspaper. Ehrlich ordered a set, but the company refused to deliver it on the grounds … Web[Ehrlich v Willis Music Co., 113 NE2d 252 (Ohio App) We have an Answer from Expert View Expert Answer. Expert Answer . Refer to the case Ehrlich v Willis Music Co (113 NE2d 252) Facts of the case: Willis (defendant) advertised a TV set for 1/10 We have an Answer from Expert Buy This Answer $5 ... ford of port richey service center
Ehrlich v. Willis Music Co 93 Ohio App. 246 Ohio Ct. App ...
WebEhrlich v. Willis Music Co Agency — Authority — Salesman authorized to sell television sets — Not authorized to sell at mistakenly quoted price, when — Apparent authority not created, when — Purchaser having reasonable grounds to suspect lack of authority. MATTHEWS, J. WebFrederick Loeser & Co. (1924), 124 Misc. 81, 207 N.Y.S. 753; Ehrlich v. Willis Music Co. (1952), 93 Ohio App. 246, 113 N..... Cronin v. Nat'l Shawmut Bank. United States; United … WebWillis Music Co. advertised a television set at $22.50 in the Sunday newspaper. Ehrlich ordered a set, but the company refused to deliver it on the grounds that the price in the … ford of palm beach