WebBurnet v. Spokane Ambulance , 131 Wn.2d 484 , 494, 933 P.2d 1036 (1997). This " 'determination should not be distributed on appeal except on a clear showing of abuse of discretion, that is, discretion manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.' WebOct 20, 2015 · Muhl appeals, claiming that the trial court erred by (1) striking her expert witness without performing the analysis required by Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wn.2d 484, 933 P.3d 1036 (1997), (2) dismissing her claims when material issues of fact remained about each, and (3) violating the appearance of fairness doctrine, necessitating …
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF …
Web2 Citing Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wn.2d 484, 933 P.2d 1036 (1997), Cantu argues that the trial court should have given him more time to conduct discovery, not dismiss his case. In Burnet, our Supreme Court held that when imposing sanctions for discovery violations under CR 37(b)(2), the trial court must http://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/171wn2d/171wn2d0342.htm tiny knights game
Don’t Count the Witnesses Before They’re Called–A …
WebJun 29, 2009 · Sto Industries, Inc., "nothing in Burnet suggests that trial courts must go through the Burnet factors every time they impose sanctions for discovery abuses." «10» «8» 131 Wn.2d 484, 494, 933 P.2d 1036 (1997).» «9» Blair cites Division Three's opinion in Peluso v. Barton Auto Dealerships, Inc., 138 Wn. App. 65, 69, 155 P.3d 978 (2007 ... Web, 131 Wn.2d 484, 933 P.2d 1036 (1997), Division I applied established Washington law, which strongly favors resolution of disputes on the merits and reserves the severe … WebJun 5, 1997 · Page 484 131 Wn.2d 484 933 P.2d 1036 William BURNET and Elene S. Burnet, individually and as guardian ad litem for Tristen L. Burnet, their minor child, … patches for service dogs